"And so we got into a big fight with these lawyers who insisted that we can't name the nonprofits.
#2000 mules citizen free press movie
"Basically, when you're putting a movie in the theater, you need three different types of insurance," D'Souza told Megyn Kelly on her podcast earlier this year. The film version of "2,000 Mules" does not name a single nonprofit that D'Souza or True the Vote allege took part in the alleged scheme, let alone give them a chance to respond to the accusation that they committed crimes.ĭ'Souza told interviewers that the reason for the omission was due to legal concerns. To build that case, "2,000 Mules" relies on True the Vote, which claims that it used cell phone location data to prove its case. The central thesis of "2,000 Mules" is essentially that left-wing nonprofit groups engaged in illegal ballot trafficking and paid people (the "mules" of the title) to gather ballots and stuff dropboxes with pro-Biden votes. Here's what's in the book: D'Souza names nonprofits that he claims helped 'steal' the 2020 election In a statement to NPR, the group distanced itself from the book.ĭespite the publisher's recall, NPR was able to find a copy of "2,000 Mules" at a Barnes & Noble bookstore. Both Engelbrecht and Phillips are credited as executive producers of the film. The film and book are both based on the research of a controversial organization called True the Vote, and the activists Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips. Another raised the possibility of legal action. One group, whose data are cited in the book, said it would request a correction. They referred to passages in the book as "malarkey," "inaccurate," and "trash." NPR contacted organizations named in the book for comment about some of D'Souza's written claims. The book adds new details, however, which NPR has been able to scrutinize. As a result, some elements of the film were difficult, if not impossible, to fully fact-check.
The film's allegations were often vague, and largely based on data that have not been made public. For Trump and some of his most diehard fans - among them candidates for public office - the project has served as "proof" of the stolen election. Former Attorney General Bill Barr called the film's underlying premise " indefensible."ĭespite those flaws, "2,000 Mules" has emerged as a leading theory for supporters of Trump's baseless claim that he actually won the 2020 election. The book does, however, regurgitate the content of the film "2,000 Mules" including misleading claims, which have been thoroughly debunked by fact-checkers and critics across the political spectrum. The book does not appear to suffer from an obvious production error which might explain the delay a misaligned photo, incorrect page numbers or blank pages. "Somehow a significant error got missed by the publisher," he said.īut not every copy of the book got recalled.Īfter traveling in Los Angeles traffic to more than a half-dozen booksellers, NPR found a copy of the "2,000 Mules" tucked into a shelf of the "Current Affairs" section at a Barnes & Noble in the San Fernando Valley. On Twitter, D'Souza blamed Regnery for the recall. Then, just before the book's scheduled release - and after copies had already arrived in stores - D'Souza's publisher, Regnery, abruptly pulled the book from shelves and delayed the e-book release, citing an unspecified "publishing error." Regnery is a division of Salem Media Group, which reduced its quarterly earnings estimate because of the delay. The book version of "2,000 Mules," the latest project from author and filmmaker Dinesh D'Souza, was abruptly recalled due to an unspecified "error."įor months, the conservative provocateur Dinesh D'Souza teased that the book version of his widely debunked film "2,000 Mules" would provide compelling new evidence that the 2020 election was "stolen." The film has been repeatedly promoted by former President Donald Trump, who even hosted a screening at his Mar-a-Lago resort.
0 kommentar(er)
